Questões Concurso TCU

Pesquise questões de concurso nos filtros abaixo

Listagem de Questões Concurso TCU

#Questão 1014402 - Estatística, Conhecimentos de estatística, FGV, 2022, TCU, Auditor Federal de Controle Externo

Considere a seguinte sequência de 2001 valores: x1=-1000, x2=-999, ..., x1001=0, x1002=1, ..., x2001=1000. A covariância amostral entre essa sequência e a sequência de seus valores ao quadrado (yi = xi 2 ) é:

#Questão 1014985 - Estatística, , FGV, 2022, TCU, Auditor Federal de Controle Externo

Assuma que processos contra a empresa A podem ter somente dois resultados finais: favorável ou desfavorável. O resultado final de cada processo é independente dos demais e tem a mesma probabilidade de ser favorável. No primeiro ano, de 1.000 processos, 850 foram favoráveis. No segundo ano, de 1.000 processos, 750 foram favoráveis. No terceiro ano, sabemos que haverá 2.000 processos.
O intervalo de 95% de confiança para a quantidade de processos favoráveis no terceiro ano é: 

The function of the extract “i.e., risks associated with how organizations operate in respect to their impact on the world around them” (fourth paragraph) is to:

A universidade YEDU implantou um sistema ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) no final da década de 1990. Ao longo dos anos, foram feitas diversas customizações para atender novas demandas de negócio. Após um tempo, tornou-se evidente uma disparidade de dados na YEDU. Um mesmo aluno era visto em até seis sistemas. Para agravar ainda mais essa disparidade, os nomes e os atributos dos alunos foram preenchidos com diversos erros de digitação em cada sistema. Os sistemas de BI não possuíam recursos para mostrar uma visão única de cada aluno.
A alta administração da YEDU decidiu então implementar um programa de Gestão e Governança de Dados. Para resolver o problema de repetições de dados de alunos na YEDU, o CDO (Chief Data Officer) definiu corretamente a seguinte abordagem:

Internal audit’s role in ESG reporting


Conversations and focus on sustainability, typically grouped into environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues, are quickly evolving — from activist investor groups and inquisitive regulators pushing for change to governing bodies and C-suite executives struggling to understand and embrace the concept. At the forefront of this new risk area is pressure for organizations to make public commitments to sustainability and provide routine updates to ESG-related strategies, goals, and metrics that are accurate and relevant. However, ESG reporting is still immature, and there is not a lot of definitive guidance for organizations in this space. For example, there is no single standard for what should be reported.


 What is clear is that strong governance over ESG — as with effective governance overall — requires alignment among the principal players as outlined in The Internal Institute of Auditors (IIA) Three Lines Model. As with any risk area, internal audit should be well-positioned to support the governing body and management with objective assurance, insights, and advice on ESG matters.


Embarking on the ESG journey


Efforts to mitigate the accelerating effects of climate change and address perceived historical social inequities are two powerful issues driving change globally. These movements have enhanced awareness of how all organizations impact, influence, and interact with society and the environment.

They also have spurred organizations to better recognize and manage ESG risks (i.e., risks associated with how organizations operate in respect to their impact on the world around them). This broad risk category includes areas that are dynamic and often driven by factors that can be difficult to measure objectively.

Still, there is growing urgency for organizations to understand and manage ESG risks, particularly as investors and regulators focus on organizations producing high-quality reporting on sustainability efforts. What’s more, that pressure is being reflected increasingly in executive performance as more organizations tie incentive compensation metrics to ESG goals.

As ESG reporting becomes increasingly common, it should be treated with the same care as financial reporting. Organizations need to recognize that ESG reporting must be built on a strategically crafted system of internal controls and accurately reflect how an organization’s ESG efforts relate to each other, the organization’s finances, and value creation.

Internal audit can and should play a significant role in an organization’s ESG journey. It can add value in an advisory capacity by helping to identify and establish a functional ESG control environment. It also can offer critical assurance support by providing an independent and objective review of the effectiveness of ESG risk assessments, responses, and controls.

Source: Adapted from https://na.theiia.org/about-ia/PublicDocuments/WhitePaper-Internal-Audits-Role-in-ESG-Reporting.pdf



The excerpt “Efforts to mitigate the accelerating effects of climate change” (third paragraph) indicates that, if effective, the speed of climate change will be:

Navegue em mais matérias e assuntos

{TITLE}

{CONTENT}

{TITLE}

{CONTENT}
Estude Grátis