Questões Concurso TCU

#Questão 1025704 - Legislação dos Tribunais de Contas (TCU, TCEs e TCMs) e Ministérios Públicos de Contas, Tribunal de Contas da União, FGV, 2022, TCU, Auditor Federal de Controle Externo

A Lei Orgânica do Tribunal de Contas da União (Lei Federal nº 8.443, de 16 de julho de 1992) prevê a competência da Corte para decidir sobre consulta que lhe seja formulada por autoridade competente, a respeito de dúvida suscitada na aplicação de dispositivos legais e regulamentares concernentes à matéria de sua competência, tratando-se de importante instrumento processual vocacionado ao exercício da função orientadora e pedagógica por parte do TCU. A respeito da apreciação e formulação de respostas a consultas que sejam dirigidas ao TCU, deve-se considerar que:

A) por ser a resposta à consulta prejulgamento de matéria fática, dotada de efeito vinculante e eficácia erga omnes, o consulente é obrigado a mencionar o caso concreto que o levou a formulá-la, ainda que também submeta ao TCU, em tese, a dúvida suscitada;

B) o TCU pode conhecer de consulta para reanálise de matéria que já tenha sido objeto de consulta anterior, quando considerar que os fundamentos fáticos e jurídicos trazidos são suficientemente densos e relevantes e desde que não haja abuso de direito por parte do consulente;

C) as autoridades às quais se reconhece legitimidade para a formulação de consulta ao TCU devem demonstrar, como questão preliminar, a pertinência temática da consulta às respectivas áreas de atribuição das instituições que representam, sob pena de seu indeferimento de plano, com o respectivo arquivamento do processo;

D) para que possam ultrapassar o exame de admissibilidade, as consultas devem conter a indicação precisa do seu objeto, ser formuladas de maneira articulada e obrigatoriamente instruídas com parecer do órgão de assistência técnica ou jurídica da autoridade consulente;

E) mesmo diante do não conhecimento de consulta, pode o TCU, por impulso oficial, analisar o caso que lhe foi apresentado, situação em que as conclusões assumidas no processo terão caráter normativo e constituirão prejulgamento da tese e da matéria fática, com efeito vinculante em relação ao processo decisório do órgão demandante.

#Questão 1023131 - Inglês, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension, FGV, 2022, TCU, Auditor Federal de Controle Externo

Internal audit’s role in ESG reporting

Conversations and focus on sustainability, typically grouped into environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues, are quickly evolving — from activist investor groups and inquisitive regulators pushing for change to governing bodies and C-suite executives struggling to understand and embrace the concept. At the forefront of this new risk area is pressure for organizations to make public commitments to sustainability and provide routine updates to ESG-related strategies, goals, and metrics that are accurate and relevant. However, ESG reporting is still immature, and there is not a lot of definitive guidance for organizations in this space. For example, there is no single standard for what should be reported.

What is clear is that strong governance over ESG — as with effective governance overall — requires alignment among the principal players as outlined in The Internal Institute of Auditors (IIA) Three Lines Model. As with any risk area, internal audit should be well-positioned to support the governing body and management with objective assurance, insights, and advice on ESG matters.

Embarking on the ESG journey

Efforts to mitigate the accelerating effects of climate change and address perceived historical social inequities are two powerful issues driving change globally. These movements have enhanced awareness of how all organizations impact, influence, and interact with society and the environment.

They also have spurred organizations to better recognize and manage ESG risks (i.e., risks associated with how organizations operate in respect to their impact on the world around them). This broad risk category includes areas that are dynamic and often driven by factors that can be difficult to measure objectively.

Still, there is growing urgency for organizations to understand and manage ESG risks, particularly as investors and regulators focus on organizations producing high-quality reporting on sustainability efforts. What’s more, that pressure is being reflected increasingly in executive performance as more organizations tie incentive compensation metrics to ESG goals.

As ESG reporting becomes increasingly common, it should be treated with the same care as financial reporting. Organizations need to recognize that ESG reporting must be built on a strategically crafted system of internal controls and accurately reflect how an organization’s ESG efforts relate to each other, the organization’s finances, and value creation.

Internal audit can and should play a significant role in an organization’s ESG journey. It can add value in an advisory capacity by helping to identify and establish a functional ESG control environment. It also can offer critical assurance support by providing an independent and objective review of the effectiveness of ESG risk assessments, responses, and controls.

Source: Adapted from https://na.theiia.org/about-ia/PublicDocuments/WhitePaper-Internal-Audits-Role-in-ESG-Reporting.pdf

According to the text, “C-suite executives” (first paragraph), that is, those in top positions within a company, have been:

A) endeavoring to hold back innovation;

B) looking forward to better positions;

C) supporting less critical reports;

D) resisting sustainability issues;

E) trying to grasp the novelty.

#Questão 1025705 - Legislação dos Tribunais de Contas (TCU, TCEs e TCMs) e Ministérios Públicos de Contas, Tribunal de Contas da União, FGV, 2022, TCU, Auditor Federal de Controle Externo

#Questão 1023133 - Inglês, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension, FGV, 2022, TCU, Auditor Federal de Controle Externo

Internal audit’s role in ESG reporting

Conversations and focus on sustainability, typically grouped into environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues, are quickly evolving — from activist investor groups and inquisitive regulators pushing for change to governing bodies and C-suite executives struggling to understand and embrace the concept. At the forefront of this new risk area is pressure for organizations to make public commitments to sustainability and provide routine updates to ESG-related strategies, goals, and metrics that are accurate and relevant. However, ESG reporting is still immature, and there is not a lot of definitive guidance for organizations in this space. For example, there is no single standard for what should be reported.

What is clear is that strong governance over ESG — as with effective governance overall — requires alignment among the principal players as outlined in The Internal Institute of Auditors (IIA) Three Lines Model. As with any risk area, internal audit should be well-positioned to support the governing body and management with objective assurance, insights, and advice on ESG matters.

Embarking on the ESG journey

Efforts to mitigate the accelerating effects of climate change and address perceived historical social inequities are two powerful issues driving change globally. These movements have enhanced awareness of how all organizations impact, influence, and interact with society and the environment.

They also have spurred organizations to better recognize and manage ESG risks (i.e., risks associated with how organizations operate in respect to their impact on the world around them). This broad risk category includes areas that are dynamic and often driven by factors that can be difficult to measure objectively.

Still, there is growing urgency for organizations to understand and manage ESG risks, particularly as investors and regulators focus on organizations producing high-quality reporting on sustainability efforts. What’s more, that pressure is being reflected increasingly in executive performance as more organizations tie incentive compensation metrics to ESG goals.

As ESG reporting becomes increasingly common, it should be treated with the same care as financial reporting. Organizations need to recognize that ESG reporting must be built on a strategically crafted system of internal controls and accurately reflect how an organization’s ESG efforts relate to each other, the organization’s finances, and value creation.

Internal audit can and should play a significant role in an organization’s ESG journey. It can add value in an advisory capacity by helping to identify and establish a functional ESG control environment. It also can offer critical assurance support by providing an independent and objective review of the effectiveness of ESG risk assessments, responses, and controls.

Source: Adapted from https://na.theiia.org/about-ia/PublicDocuments/WhitePaper-Internal-Audits-Role-in-ESG-Reporting.pdf

Based on the information provided by the text, mark the statements below as true (T) or false (F).
( ) One of the hurdles of ESG issues is that they have been restricted to a single group of experts.
( ) There has been such a great demand for publicizing government efforts towards ESG that reports have become accurate and systematized.
( ) Part of the internal auditor’s job is to be knowledgeable enough in the area of ESG so as to be able to provide solid guidance to those in charge of the administration.

The statements are, respectively:

#Questão 1029618 - Legislação Especial Federal, Lei nº 12.846 de 2013 - Responsabilização administrativa e civil de pessoas jurídicas pela prática de atos contra a administração pública, nacional ou estrangeira - Lei Anticorrupção, FGV, 2022, TCU, Auditor Federal de Controle Externo

Sobre o sistema da Lei Anticorrupção, é correto afirmar que:

A) na responsabilização pela Lei Anticorrupção, em que vigora o princípio da especialidade legal, têm incidência as disposições dos Arts. 49-A e 50 do Código Civil, que tratam da responsabilidade dos sócios e da desconsideração da personalidade jurídica;

B) a Lei Anticorrupção prevê a responsabilidade solidária das sociedades consorciadas, bem como daquelas controladoras, controladas ou coligadas, sendo possível marcar todas com a obrigação de pagamento de multa e reparação integral do dano causado;

C) sendo despida de natureza penal, a Lei Anticorrupção alcança fatos ocorridos antes da sua vigência, desde que haja concorrência com outros fatos praticados posteriormente a 29/01/2014, conexos ou não;

D) decorre da Lei Anticorrupção a possibilidade de se exigir programa de integridade das pessoas jurídicas, diante do estabelecimento de um rol taxativo de documentos de comprovação de habilitação jurídica, qualificação técnica, qualificação econômico-financeira, regularidade fiscal e trabalhista;

E) a Lei nº 12.846/2013 prevê explicitamente acerca do funcionamento e da prática de política de prevenção e do programa de integridade e incentivo à comunicação de irregularidades por parte das sociedades empresárias.

Questões Concurso TCU

Pesquise questões de concurso nos filtros abaixo