Judge the following items based on the previous text.
The verbal tense “could be” (l.8) can be correctly replaced by must have been.
Judge the following items based on the previous text.
The modal "could, in "could be" (l.8), means that it was possible.
Judge the following items based on the previous text.
The determiner “another” (l.9) can be correctly replaced by other.
In the text, it is correct to replace the expression
“President Lula” (l.1) by the President Lula.
According to the text, judge the following items.
The choice of “it will have generated” (l.16-17) instead of it will generate shows that the action will be achieved by a particular time in the future.
In the text, without a change in meaning, the expression
“By the end” (l.6) can be replaced by At the end.
In the text,
the use of “is no fan of” (l.18) instead of isn’t a fan of emphasizes the negative idea in the sentence.
In the text,
“until” (l.26) can be correctly replaced by by.
A suitable paraphrase of “Implementation principles will be followed by a review of steps” (l.5-6) is
Based on the text, judge the following items.
Science and technology now play an important role in international diplomacy the same way as uncountable other emerging matters do.
