
Judge the following items based on the previous text.
The final “-ed” in “encouraged” (l.3), “worked” (l.5), “offered” (l.6) and “pooled” (l.13) is pronounced the same because its preceding sound is voiced.

Judge the following items based on the previous text.
The final “-ed” in “encouraged” (l.3), “worked” (l.5), “offered” (l.6) and “pooled” (l.13) is pronounced the same because its preceding sound is voiced.

Judge the following items based on the previous text.
The verb “settle” (l.4) is to “settlers” (l.10) as teach is to teachers.

Judge the following items based on the previous text.
The verb “clearing” (l.7) can be correctly replaced by to clear.

Judge the following items based on the previous text.
The clause introduced by “even though” (l.7) is a concessive clause.

Judge the following items based on the previous text.
The verbal tense “could be” (l.8) can be correctly replaced by must have been.

Judge the following items based on the previous text.
The modal "could, in "could be" (l.8), means that it was possible.
Judge the following items based on the previous text.
The determiner “another” (l.9) can be correctly replaced by other.

In the text, it is correct to replace the expression
“President Lula” (l.1) by the President Lula.

According to the text, judge the following items.
The choice of “it will have generated” (l.16-17) instead of it will generate shows that the action will be achieved by a particular time in the future.

In the text, without a change in meaning, the expression
“By the end” (l.6) can be replaced by At the end.