Concerning the previous text and its linguistic aspects, judge the following items.
The subject of the verbal form “is”, in the fragment “is an example of such globalization” (l. 6 and 7), is “English” (l.4).
Concerning the previous text and its linguistic aspects, judge the following items.
According to the text, it can be said that experts in language seem to hold differing views on the dissemination of English in many parts of the world.
Concerning the previous text and its linguistic aspects, judge the following items.
In the fragment “rather than a practical necessity or reality for many people”(l. 11 and 12), “rather than” means instead of.
Concerning the previous text and its linguistic aspects, judge the following items.
In the passage “The British linguist David Crystal suggests that English fosters cultural opportunity” (l. 16 and 17), the word “that” can be omitted without this making the sentence grammatically incorrect.
Concerning the previous text and its linguistic aspects, judge the following items.
The fragment “to play a key role in” (l.21) can be correctly rewritten as to have a leading part in, without changing the meaning of the text.
Judge the following items according to the ideas of the previous text and its linguistic aspects.
The notions that students have no motivation and that an individual can be directly motivated can make a teacher’s job very difficult.
Judge the following items according to the ideas of the previous text and its linguistic aspects.
According to the text, the source of motivation is found inside a person.
Judge the following items according to the ideas of the previous text and its linguistic aspects.
The fragment “prevent them from using” (l. 4 and 5) can be correctly replaced with prevent them to use.
Judge the following items according to the ideas of the previous text and its linguistic aspects.
In “As long as a student chooses goals” (l. 7 and 8), “as long as” means after a long time.
Judge the following items according to the ideas of the previous text and its linguistic aspects.
The deletion of “do” in “Different theoretical interpretations do, however, shed light” (l. 22 and 23) would not change the meaning of the fragment.