Although.

However.

Nevertheless.

Still.

IMF has not dared to open its reserved archives in Washington to the public in general.

IMF has been adopting a transparency policy so as to enhance its credibility and legitimacy.

IMF must be freed from the impositions of the world leaders on its financial decisions.

once secret information kept by the IMF is not freely discussed nor is it easily negotiable.

world economies are trying to get rid of the excessive control of the IMF over their financial systems.

public must be made aware of what the IMF has been doing and the support it is giving to economic policy issues.

IMF will be regarded as a more trustworthy institution if it releases its documents and financial decisions to the public at large.

language used in documents that circulate publicly is usually more controlled and therefore less frank and direct in exposing opinions and facts.

lack of access of external stakeholders to the issues the IMF supports and the actions it takes makes the institution more vulnerable and less effective.

relevant changes made to the financing structure of the institution were only effected in recognition of the IMF as a reputable and candid organization.

"In all, it makes us a more effective and legitimate institution." - lines 21-22. (all things considered).

"the Fund cannot be a genuine leader on economic policy issues unless it is seen as transparent." - lines 23-24. (given that).

"Rather, further efforts should focus on making progress on a broad front, on issues that may catch fewer headlines," - lines 45-47. (moreover).

"To this end, there is a long-standing and fundamental principle that Fund reports are not 'negotiated' documents." - lines 52-54. (last but not least).

"We should also consider whether we can make some archived material available more quickly to the public." - lines 58-60. (while).